The pre-voting environment to elect the new President of the Republic and the Congress must have the most arrogant members of the Political Committee, the Central Committee, in a very difficult situation, a good number of representatives who hold the rank of average leaders for carry a PLD brand franchise in your pockets; and also the litter of “neopeledeism” that once entrenched themselves in Danilism and Leonelism.
In this group of neo-Peledeists, a large number of profane members of the so-called civil society militate, tricksters who thrive on the parties in the hunt for power sheds and who at bottom with their careerist practice contradict the very nature of the concept of civil society, from its primeval thinkers (from Aristotle, Hobbes, and Hegel to Prince Alexis de Tocqueville, Maurice Duverger, Jürgêns Habermas, and other exponents) who defined civil society as the civic, nonpartisan, non-parastatal organization whose mission is to defend civil, political rights , economic, cultural of citizens against the attacks of the economic, political power and the state apparatus.
In other words, this “caste” of intruders and invited by group conveniences do not know, per se, or ignore “a pota”, that as soon as a leader or militant of civil society accepts a public office or direct economic link with the State, automatically he is renouncing his status as a vendor of rights and a member of civil society to become his antipode or an actor in political society.
Apart from that, that mercenary litter that little by little came to shape “neo-Peledeism” as a kind of influential periphery is made up of “communication billers and media executives through designated interposers entered the lists of millionaire contracts advertising and “consultants” that actually made them face-to-face managers of unrealized but highly paid services. “
On their side, to a large extent, with their anger, the group made up of leaders, true mamuses detached from the party bases and inserted into their new social position after a prolonged exercise of office and accumulation, together with the litter of “neo-Pedelists warming ears of presidents »from tribunes as the so-called« public opinion makers »led the leadership to scrapes that moved the PLD from a position of possible slack for the triumph in electoral competition, for the preservation of state and party power in well balanced and balanced proportions ; and they have brought the once more compact political organization in the country to the brink of uncertainty, founded by Don Juan Bosch with a view to transforming the lives of the Dominican people for good.
All this, without danilism or leonelismo being able to exhibit the slightest ideological or methodological difference in the plane of the political struggle for power, since they do everything the same but with direction and orientation towards a contrary leadership. It seems that their difference only lies in the composition of the economic groups inserted in politics with a view to exercising the original accumulation of wealth. So similar are they in objective, that both groups have the same aspirational model of political power: “all or nothing”
The stubbornness of both leaders caused the unforeseen result that was the split caused by the imprint of “all or nothing.” Thus, the doing of both forces threatens to translate shortly into a serious backwardness of the model and of the development process driven by the Peledeísmo of Danilo and Leonel, both leaders of the governments of the last 16 consecutive years. Essentially, this political misstep would be opening the way for the traditional model of orthodox perredeism, now personified by the leaders and militants of the Modern Revolutionary Party (PRM), who are predominantly promoters of the induced demand or voracious consumption of wealth.
Do you remember the final balance of the Dominican economy during and at the end of the governments 1982-1986 and 2000-2004, managed exactly by the same actors, the true accumulators originating in wealth? Their threat of return is that now more than 60% of today’s voters, young people, do not know it because they did not suffer the high social costs of the incredible incapacity and voracity over the national treasure that have been on pause for 16 years due to punishment. electoral that since then the people applied to them; and whose “gluttonies” have begun to be evident from the municipal level that they held just two months ago.
I do not know if it is worth exposing it, but Leonel and Danilo now have exactly one week’s deadline to correct the misunderstanding of both leaders, who are still considered the most pre-clear on the Dominican political scene, I think!
— Carlos Rodríguez to eldia.com.do